Ing an antibody to the human CTLA-4 ectodomain to assess localisation (Figure 1C). Xenopus and chicken chimeras revealed a pattern similar to human CTLA-4 with a punctate intracellular distribution. In contrast, the chimera with the trout C-terminus showed robust surface expression with far more limited intracellular vesicles. This difference in the amount of surface CTLA-4 relative to the total was quantified by flow cytometry and is shown in figure 1D.Comparison of the endocytic ability of CTLA-4 orthologuesThe increased surface expression observed with chimeric trout CTLA-4 suggested that the C-terminus of trout CTLA-4 might confer less efficient internalisation consistent with its lack of a YXKM motif. To assay internalisation directly, we labeled cells at 37uC with an unconjugated anti-CTLA-4 Ab so as to label CTLA4 protein cycling from the plasma membrane. Cells were subsequently placed on ice to prevent further trafficking and receptors remaining at the cell surface labeled with a fluorescently conjugated secondary antibody (red). Cells were then fixed and permeabilised and internalised CTLA-4 protein detected with a different fluorescently conjugated secondary antibody (green) before analysing cells by confocal microscopy (Figure 2A). To quantify these differences, internalisation was also measured as a ratio of plasma membrane (red) to internalised (green) CTLA-4 (Figure 2B). Human CTLA-4 possessed the lowest surface to internalised ratio reflecting that CTLA-4 25837696 is predominantly localised in intracellular vesicles, which was similar to chimeric constructs from xenopus and chicken CTLA-4. In contrast, the Cterminus of trout CTLA-4 showed a greater surface to internalised ratio suggesting relatively poor PD168393 web endocytosis consistent with its 
more obvious surface phenotype. To assay the efficiency of CTLA-4 internalisation more quantitatively in multiple cells, we used a flow cytometric approach. Cycling CTLA-4 was labeled with a PE-conjugated anti-CTLA-4 Ab at 37uC. Cells were subsequently washed and placed on ice and any order CAL 120 residual surface primary antibody was detected using a secondary antibody (Figure 2C). For WT CTLA-4 this generates a curved plot where the extensive cycling label at 37uC (Y-axis) is greater than the minimal surface label (xaxis), typical of an endocytic protein. Whilst both chicken andFigure 1. Generation and localisation of CTLA-4 chimeras. A. Cterminal sequence alignments of selected mammalian CTLA-4 based on sequence data from Ensembl and in ref 12. B. Diagram of human CTLA-CTLA-4 TraffickingFigure 2. Cellular localisation of CTLA-4 chimeras. A. CHO cells expressing CTLA-4 chimeras were incubated with unlabeled anti-CTLA-4 Ab at 37uC for 1 hour, cooled to 4uC and surface CTLA-4 stained red with anti-mouse Alexa 555. Cells 
were subsequently fixed, permeabilised and stained with Alexa488 anti-mouse IgG (green) and imaged by confocal microscopy. B. The ratio of plasma membrane to internalised CTLA-4 fluorescence (PM/I) was calculated by outlining cells in ImageJ. C. CHO cells expressing human CTLA-4 were labeled with anti-CTLA-4 PE at 37uC for 30 minutes followed by labeling surface CTLA-4 on ice (4uC) with Alexa647 anti-mouse IgG. Cells were analysed by flow cytometry and data are plotted as cycling CTLA-4 (37uC label) vs surface CTLA-4 (4uC label). D. CHO cells expressing the CTLA-4 chimeras were labeled as described in C and analysed by flow cytometry. Dotted line provides a standard gradient for reference purpose.Ing an antibody to the human CTLA-4 ectodomain to assess localisation (Figure 1C). Xenopus and chicken chimeras revealed a pattern similar to human CTLA-4 with a punctate intracellular distribution. In contrast, the chimera with the trout C-terminus showed robust surface expression with far more limited intracellular vesicles. This difference in the amount of surface CTLA-4 relative to the total was quantified by flow cytometry and is shown in figure 1D.Comparison of the endocytic ability of CTLA-4 orthologuesThe increased surface expression observed with chimeric trout CTLA-4 suggested that the C-terminus of trout CTLA-4 might confer less efficient internalisation consistent with its lack of a YXKM motif. To assay internalisation directly, we labeled cells at 37uC with an unconjugated anti-CTLA-4 Ab so as to label CTLA4 protein cycling from the plasma membrane. Cells were subsequently placed on ice to prevent further trafficking and receptors remaining at the cell surface labeled with a fluorescently conjugated secondary antibody (red). Cells were then fixed and permeabilised and internalised CTLA-4 protein detected with a different fluorescently conjugated secondary antibody (green) before analysing cells by confocal microscopy (Figure 2A). To quantify these differences, internalisation was also measured as a ratio of plasma membrane (red) to internalised (green) CTLA-4 (Figure 2B). Human CTLA-4 possessed the lowest surface to internalised ratio reflecting that CTLA-4 25837696 is predominantly localised in intracellular vesicles, which was similar to chimeric constructs from xenopus and chicken CTLA-4. In contrast, the Cterminus of trout CTLA-4 showed a greater surface to internalised ratio suggesting relatively poor endocytosis consistent with its more obvious surface phenotype. To assay the efficiency of CTLA-4 internalisation more quantitatively in multiple cells, we used a flow cytometric approach. Cycling CTLA-4 was labeled with a PE-conjugated anti-CTLA-4 Ab at 37uC. Cells were subsequently washed and placed on ice and any residual surface primary antibody was detected using a secondary antibody (Figure 2C). For WT CTLA-4 this generates a curved plot where the extensive cycling label at 37uC (Y-axis) is greater than the minimal surface label (xaxis), typical of an endocytic protein. Whilst both chicken andFigure 1. Generation and localisation of CTLA-4 chimeras. A. Cterminal sequence alignments of selected mammalian CTLA-4 based on sequence data from Ensembl and in ref 12. B. Diagram of human CTLA-CTLA-4 TraffickingFigure 2. Cellular localisation of CTLA-4 chimeras. A. CHO cells expressing CTLA-4 chimeras were incubated with unlabeled anti-CTLA-4 Ab at 37uC for 1 hour, cooled to 4uC and surface CTLA-4 stained red with anti-mouse Alexa 555. Cells were subsequently fixed, permeabilised and stained with Alexa488 anti-mouse IgG (green) and imaged by confocal microscopy. B. The ratio of plasma membrane to internalised CTLA-4 fluorescence (PM/I) was calculated by outlining cells in ImageJ. C. CHO cells expressing human CTLA-4 were labeled with anti-CTLA-4 PE at 37uC for 30 minutes followed by labeling surface CTLA-4 on ice (4uC) with Alexa647 anti-mouse IgG. Cells were analysed by flow cytometry and data are plotted as cycling CTLA-4 (37uC label) vs surface CTLA-4 (4uC label). D. CHO cells expressing the CTLA-4 chimeras were labeled as described in C and analysed by flow cytometry. Dotted line provides a standard gradient for reference purpose.
