Least two years without ART and a proximal CD4+ T cell count of above 350 cells/mm3 (n = 20), and (ii) HIV-1 noncontrollers (NC), defined as untreated subjects who had HIV-1 RNA levels greater than 2000 copies/ml (n = 20). PBMCs from 30 healthy blood donors from the Stanford Blood Center, Palo Alto, CA and 10 healthy blood donors from San Francisco, CA were included as controls. This study was approved by the UCSF Committee on Human Research and all subjects provided written informed consent to participate in this study, in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.CD96 Microcystin-LR manufacturer expression Following StimulationPBMCs (56105 cells) from healthy individuals were stimulated with either lipopolysaccharide (LPS, 1 mg/ml), PHA (1 mg/ml), IL-12 and IL-18 (50 ng/ml of each, Peprotech, Rocky Hill, NJ) or anti-CD3 (clone HIT3a, 1 mg/ml; BD Biosciences) in combination with anti-CD28 (L293, 1 ug/ml; BD Biosciences) for 24 hrs. Cells were surface stained with PE-conjugated anti-CD96, Alexa700conjugated anti-CD4, APC-Cy7-conjugated anti-CD8. ECDconjugated anti-CD3 expression was determined following cell permeabilization with FACS permeabilizing solution 2 (BD Biosciences) and intracellular staining.Statistical AnalysisAll statistical analyses were performed using Prism 4.0 (GraphPad software). Flow cytometry data was analyzed using either KruskalWallis test followed by the Dunn post-test or a Student’s T test as indicated. 23408432 Correlation coefficients were determined by Spearman rank correlation. P values were based on two-tailed tests and results , 0.05 were considered statistically significant.Flow CytometryA total of 56105 PBMCs was surface stained with antibody mixtures in FACS buffer (phosphate buffer saline containing 0.5 bovine serum albumin (BSA) and 2 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)) on ice for 30 min. Antibodies used included: Alexa700-conjugated anti-CD4 (clone RPA-T4), phycoerythrinCy7 (ML-240 site PE-Cy7)-conjugated anti-CCR7 (clone 3D12), PerCP Cy5.CD96 Expression during HIV-1 InfectionResults CD96 is Down-regulated on CD8+ T Cells in HIV-1 NoncontrollersThe expression of CD96 during HIV-1 infection has not previously been assessed, but based on reports that CD96 is upregulated during T cell activation [9] we hypothesized that CD96 would be higher in HIV-1 patients due to persistent immune activation. To determine if the CD96 expression was changed during HIV-1 infection, we assessed CD96 expression by CD8+ T cells in elite controllers (EC) (mean 961 CD4+ T cells/mm3 and , 50 RNA copies/ml), HIV-1 non-controllers (NC) (mean 536 CD4+ T cells/mm3 and mean 68,049 RNA copies/ml) and healthy controls (HC). Representative histograms and dot plots of CD96 expression in healthy controls (HC), elite controllers (EC) and noncontrollers (NC) are shown in Figure 1A, where CD96 expression was determined based on fluorescence minus one (FMO) control. We found that a high percentage of resting CD8+ T cells expressed CD96 in healthy individuals (Fig. 1B). Unexpectedly, the frequency of CD96-expressing CD8+ T cells was significantly lower in both HIV-1 infected groups (p , 0.001 for both groups) compared to healthy controls (HC) (Fig. 1B). However, the frequency of CD96-expressing CD8+ T cells was significantly higher in the EC group compared to the NC group (p , 0.05). Furthermore, the CD96 mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) on CD8+ T cells was significantly lower in the NC group (mean MFI = 510) compared to the healthy controls (mean MFI = 690, Fig. 1C). In contra.Least two years without ART and a proximal CD4+ T cell count of above 350 cells/mm3 (n = 20), and (ii) HIV-1 noncontrollers (NC), defined as untreated subjects who had HIV-1 RNA levels greater than 2000 copies/ml (n = 20). PBMCs from 30 healthy blood donors from the Stanford Blood Center, Palo Alto, CA and 10 healthy blood donors from San Francisco, CA were included as controls. This study was approved by the UCSF Committee on Human Research and all subjects provided written informed consent to participate in this study, in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.CD96 Expression Following StimulationPBMCs (56105 cells) from healthy individuals were stimulated with either lipopolysaccharide (LPS, 1 mg/ml), PHA (1 mg/ml), IL-12 and IL-18 (50 ng/ml of each, Peprotech, Rocky Hill, NJ) or anti-CD3 (clone HIT3a, 1 mg/ml; BD Biosciences) in combination with anti-CD28 (L293, 1 ug/ml; BD Biosciences) for 24 hrs. Cells were surface stained with PE-conjugated anti-CD96, Alexa700conjugated anti-CD4, APC-Cy7-conjugated anti-CD8. ECDconjugated anti-CD3 expression was determined following cell permeabilization with FACS permeabilizing solution 2 (BD Biosciences) and intracellular staining.Statistical AnalysisAll statistical analyses were performed using Prism 4.0 (GraphPad software). Flow cytometry data was analyzed using either KruskalWallis test followed by the Dunn post-test or a Student’s T test as indicated. 23408432 Correlation coefficients were determined by Spearman rank correlation. P values were based on two-tailed tests and results , 0.05 were considered statistically significant.Flow CytometryA total of 56105 PBMCs was surface stained with antibody mixtures in FACS buffer (phosphate buffer saline containing 0.5 bovine serum albumin (BSA) and 2 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)) on ice for 30 min. Antibodies used included: Alexa700-conjugated anti-CD4 (clone RPA-T4), phycoerythrinCy7 (PE-Cy7)-conjugated anti-CCR7 (clone 3D12), PerCP Cy5.CD96 Expression during HIV-1 InfectionResults CD96 is Down-regulated on CD8+ T Cells in HIV-1 NoncontrollersThe expression of CD96 during HIV-1 infection has not previously been assessed, but based on reports that CD96 is upregulated during T cell activation [9] we hypothesized that CD96 would be higher in HIV-1 patients due to persistent immune activation. To determine if the CD96 expression was changed during HIV-1 infection, we assessed CD96 expression by CD8+ T cells in elite controllers (EC) (mean 961 CD4+ T cells/mm3 and , 50 RNA copies/ml), HIV-1 non-controllers (NC) (mean 536 CD4+ T cells/mm3 and mean 68,049 RNA copies/ml) and healthy controls (HC). Representative histograms and dot plots of CD96 expression in healthy controls (HC), elite controllers (EC) and noncontrollers (NC) are shown in Figure 1A, where CD96 expression was determined based on fluorescence minus one (FMO) control. We found that a high percentage of resting CD8+ T cells expressed CD96 in healthy individuals (Fig. 1B). Unexpectedly, the frequency of CD96-expressing CD8+ T cells was significantly lower in both HIV-1 infected groups (p , 0.001 for both groups) compared to healthy controls (HC) (Fig. 1B). However, the frequency of CD96-expressing CD8+ T cells was significantly higher in the EC group compared to the NC group (p , 0.05). Furthermore, the CD96 mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) on CD8+ T cells was significantly lower in the NC group (mean MFI = 510) compared to the healthy controls (mean MFI = 690, Fig. 1C). In contra.
