Cancer research and a framework for biomarker discovery. To our knowledge, proteomic studies of ovarian cancer ascites are limited, and a comparative study between SMER 28 chemical information intrinsic chemoresistant and chemosensitive ovarian cancer ascites by DIGE technology has not been previously reported. The findings of our study may aid in the prediction of therapeutic responses and disease prognosis for ovarian cancer patients. Our first aim was to find unique biomarkers just in the ascites fluid and not in the cell fraction as in Kislinger’s study [13]. Thus, we separated the fluid fraction from cellular components for 2D-DIGE by centrifugation. As biomarkers may be present at low concentrations in body fluids such as serum and ascites, one major challenge to performing indepth analysis of proteomes by mass spectrometry is the presence of highly abundant proteins such as albumin and immunoglobulins, which constitute 65?7 of serum proteins [15]. These abundant proteins limit the ionization efficiency during MS analysis, preventing the identification of low abundance proteins. Therefore, depleting the highly abundant proteins by using a 2Dclean up kit was necessary before our analysis in order to detect lowly abundant biomarkers. In our study, a total of 11 differentially proteins were identified between chemosensitive and chemoresistant ovarian cancer ascites. It was not unexpected that some proteins were identified in multiple spots, since many proteins in ascites are known to existBiomarkers for Chemoresistant Ovarian CancerFigure 2. (top) Proteomic analysis of ascites by 2D-DIGE. A representative 2D-DIGE image (merged image) showing the protein profile of ascites of chemosensitive and chemoresistant ovarian cancer patients labeled with Cy5 (red spots) and Cy3 (green spots), respectively, with an internal standard labeled with Cy2. IPG strips (24 cm, pH 4-7) were used for IEF prior to standard SDS-PAGE (12.5 polyacrylamide) for the second dimension. The molecular weight range in the vertical dimension is approx from 150 to 10 kD. Proteins identified as differentially expressed are indicated with yellow arrows with assigned numbers from the DeCyder analysis. The numbers in the figure correspond to those presented in Table 2; (MC-LR bottom) MALDI OF S mass spectrum of spot 1543 identified as 1317923 ceruloplasmin according to the matched peaks. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0051256.gas isoforms. For example, haptoglobin and transthyretin were represented by two and three spots, respectively, and in both cases, the individual spots were similarly down-regulated. Additionally,the same protein being present in several different spots could have represented biologically relevant modifications or proteolytic fragments (e.g., ceruloplasmin).Table 2. Differentially expressed proteins between chemosensitive and chemoresistant ovarian cancer ascites identified by MALDI-TOF/TOF MS.Spot Noa Peptide count 33 45.4/5.28 MW/PI (kDa) 21.57 gi|93163358Protein nameRatiobAccession nocMascot ScoredProtein functionse Antioxidants, lipid transport and metabolism, acute-phase protein, tumorf Microtubules, movement of the cell, cytoskeletal protein Transthyretin variants implicate formation of amyloid fibril Lipid transport and metabolism, lecithin cholesterol acyltransferase, acute-phase protein Recombinant proapolipoprotein A-I Histidine-rich proteolytic fragment of ceruloplasmin Carrier Proteins, oxidoreductases, acute-phase protein, tumorfApolipoprotein A-IV Precursor21.69 21.56 2.16 gi|4557.Cancer research and a framework for biomarker discovery. To our knowledge, proteomic studies of ovarian cancer ascites are limited, and a comparative study between intrinsic chemoresistant and chemosensitive ovarian cancer ascites by DIGE technology has not been previously reported. The findings of our study may aid in the prediction of therapeutic responses and disease prognosis for ovarian cancer patients. Our first aim was to find unique biomarkers just in the ascites fluid and not in the cell fraction as in Kislinger’s study [13]. Thus, we separated the fluid fraction from cellular components for 2D-DIGE by centrifugation. As biomarkers may be present at low concentrations in body fluids such as serum and ascites, one major challenge to performing indepth analysis of proteomes by mass spectrometry is the presence of highly abundant proteins such as albumin and immunoglobulins, which constitute 65?7 of serum proteins [15]. These abundant proteins limit the ionization efficiency during MS analysis, preventing the identification of low abundance proteins. Therefore, depleting the highly abundant proteins by using a 2Dclean up kit was necessary before our analysis in order to detect lowly abundant biomarkers. In our study, a total of 11 differentially proteins were identified between chemosensitive and chemoresistant ovarian cancer ascites. It was not unexpected that some proteins were identified in multiple spots, since many proteins in ascites are known to existBiomarkers for Chemoresistant Ovarian CancerFigure 2. (top) Proteomic analysis of ascites by 2D-DIGE. A representative 2D-DIGE image (merged image) showing the protein profile of ascites of chemosensitive and chemoresistant ovarian cancer patients labeled with Cy5 (red spots) and Cy3 (green spots), respectively, with an internal standard labeled with Cy2. IPG strips (24 cm, pH 4-7) were used for IEF prior to standard SDS-PAGE (12.5 polyacrylamide) for the second dimension. The molecular weight range in the vertical dimension is approx from 150 to 10 kD. Proteins identified as differentially expressed are indicated with yellow arrows with assigned numbers from the DeCyder analysis. The numbers in the figure correspond to those presented in Table 2; (bottom) MALDI OF S mass spectrum of spot 1543 identified as 1317923 ceruloplasmin according to the matched peaks. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0051256.gas isoforms. For example, haptoglobin and transthyretin were represented by two and three spots, respectively, and in both cases, the individual spots were similarly down-regulated. Additionally,the same protein being present in several different spots could have represented biologically relevant modifications or proteolytic fragments (e.g., ceruloplasmin).Table 2. Differentially expressed proteins between chemosensitive and chemoresistant ovarian cancer ascites identified by MALDI-TOF/TOF MS.Spot Noa Peptide count 33 45.4/5.28 MW/PI (kDa) 21.57 gi|93163358Protein nameRatiobAccession nocMascot ScoredProtein functionse Antioxidants, lipid transport and metabolism, acute-phase protein, tumorf Microtubules, movement of the cell, cytoskeletal protein Transthyretin variants implicate formation of amyloid fibril Lipid transport and metabolism, lecithin cholesterol acyltransferase, acute-phase protein Recombinant proapolipoprotein A-I Histidine-rich proteolytic fragment of ceruloplasmin Carrier Proteins, oxidoreductases, acute-phase protein, tumorfApolipoprotein A-IV Precursor21.69 21.56 2.16 gi|4557.
