Es) and envious stereotypes contain groups perceived as competent but not
Es) and envious stereotypes involve groups perceived as competent but not warm (e.g experts). The majority of stereotypes connected with (out)groups are mixed (i.e higher on one particular dimension but low around the other) and consequently usually do not elicit a purely optimistic vs. adverse feeling, but rather, that of ambivalence. As outlined by Fiske et al. (2002), paternalized groups elicit pity and sympathy. Such feelings seem when the target group is not perceived as a possible competitor with the ingroup (Cottrell Neuberg, 2005; Smith, 2000). In contrast, groups perceived as competent and not warm inspire envy and admiration. These feelings are elicited when ingroup members face an outgroup that dangers taking the ingroup’s sources (Smith, 2000). The SCM offers a beneficial viewpoint to understand the original results 2,3,5,4-Tetrahydroxystilbene 2-O-β-D-glucoside obtained by Fein and Spencer (997). Their targets differed not merely in valence, but in addition in other dimensions related to their group’s stereotype content. The Jewish target belongs to an envied stereotyped group, perceived as competent but not warm. In contrast, the Italian target is perceived as warm but not competent (Cuddy, Fiske, Kwan, Glick, Demoulin, Bond, et al in press), which corresponds to a paternalistic stereotype. The two targets differed thus on additional than stereotype valence, but additionally around the dimensions of competence and warmth. The present study incorporates these dimensions. Moreover, threat could also be linked to stereotype content material, as argued beneath.Dimension of ThreatThe SCM suggests many hypotheses about which groups really should be derogated following selfthreat. The dimension on which threat is experienced may possibly play a vital part within the perceived relevance with the target to satisfy the motivation PubMed ID:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24039430 to restore selfesteem. Earlier research has shown that, following selfthreat, the distinction among ingroup and outgroup must be relevant for outgroup derogation to take place. As an illustration, this distinction need to have evaluative implications for the ingroup (Crocker, Thompson, McGraw Ingerman, 987; Forgas Fiedler, 996). Consequently, we propose that, following selfthreat on a precise dimension (e.g competence), relevant targets might be these whose group is stereotypically perceived as higher on that dimension. Thus, congruency amongst the dimension of threat along with the stereotype in the target group needs to be important in subsequent derogation of the target.Soc Cogn. Author manuscript; obtainable in PMC 204 January 06.Collange et al.PageIn line with our argument, Smith (2000) recommended that following a threat to their competence, individuals practical experience distinct feelings. These feelings differ as a function with the perceived competence on the comparison target. When the target is perceived as incompetent, which include a member of a paternalized outgroup, men and women encounter pity and sympathy toward this target. As shown by Fein and Spencer (997), within this situation, threatened participants do not derogate the target. Nevertheless, when the target is perceived as competent, people really should knowledge envy. Fein and Spencer (997) showed, in this situation, that threatened participants did derogate the target. Therefore, when the target stereotypically possesses the threatened competence, their stereotype is relevant to one’s selfenhancement aim, which should result in target derogation.NIHPA Author Manuscript NIHPA Author Manuscript NIHPA Author ManuscriptOverview of your studyWe hypothesized that, following a threat on competence, the s.
