Ted and experimental final results from the 16-Dimethyl prostaglandin E2 Autophagy achieve and phase re sponses in the LP filter by applying voltage input to node vin2 and connecting nodes vin1 and vin3 to ground, as indicated in Table 2. The simulated and experiment pole frequency are 87.63 kHz and 91.20 kHz, respectively. The % errors in the simulated and exper imental pole frequency had been two.63 and 1.33 , respectively. The simulated and experi of 25 14 mental passband voltage get have been 1.98 (5.92 dB) and 1.99 (six.01 dB), respectively. The percent errors of your simulated and experimental passband gains have been 1 and 0.5 , re spectively. The simulated and experimental phase angles at the pole frequency had been The simulated and experimental phase angles in the pole frequency were -45.76 and -45.76and -44.34 respectively. The % errors of the simulated and experimental -44.34 , respectively. The % errors in the simulated and experimental phase angles phase angles were 1.69 and 1.47 , respectively.were 1.69 and 1.47 , respectively.0-Phase (degree)–Theoretical Phase (Experimental) Phase (Simulated) Achieve (Experimental) Gain (Simulated)—100 1 10 100-40Frequency (kHz)Acquire (dB)–Figure 12. Frequency gain and phase response of LP. Figure 12. Frequency achieve and phase response of LP.The simulated and experimental LP get response with distinctive IB values (67 A, The simulated and experimental LP get response with distinctive IB values (67 , 124.5 A, 245 A) are shown in Figure 13 exactly where R1 and R and Rf remained at 1.two k. 124.5 , 245 ) are shown in Figure 13 exactly where R1 f remained at 1.two k. The outcomes The revealed that the pole frequency of LP was electronically controllable, as anticipated in Table Sensors 2021, 21, x FOR PEER Critique benefits revealed that the pole frequency of LP was electronically controllable, as 14 of 25 in expected two. With these values of IB, the theoretical pole frequencies had been 48.47 kHz, 90 kHz, and Table 2. With these values of IB , the theoretical pole frequencies have been 48.47 kHz, 90 kHz, and 177.24 kHz, Arimoclomol HSP respectively, when the simulated pole frequencies from these IB values were 177.24 kHz, respectively, when the simulated pole frequencies from these IB values have been 47.61 kHz, 87.63 kHz, and 170.86 kHz, respectively. The percent errors of the simulated 47.61 kHz, 87.63 kHz, and B170.86 kHz, respectively. The % errors of your simulated pole frequency from these I values had been 1.77 , 2.63 , and 3.60 , respectively. The ex pole frequency from these IB values were 1.77 , 2.63 , 50.11 three.60 , respectively. The perimental pole frequencies from these IB values were also and kHz, 91.20 kHz, and 181.97 kHz, respectively. The % errors in the experimental pole frequency from these experimental pole frequencies from these IB values have been also 50.11 kHz, 91.20 kHz, and IB values were three.38 , 1.33 , and two.67 , respectively. Figure 14 shows the measured input 181.97 kHz, respectively. The % errors from the experimental pole frequency from these Iand output waveform of LP, exactly where the input signal amplitude was 20 mVpp with three B values have been 3.38 , 1.33 , and 2.67 , respectively. Figure 14 shows the measured input frequencies (10 kHz, 100 kHz, 1 MHz). and output waveform of LP, exactly where the input signal amplitude was 20 mVp-p with three frequencies (10 kHz, 100 kHz, 1 MHz).Obtain (dB)-10 Theoretical IB=67uA (Experimental) IB=124.5uA (Experimental) IB=245uA (Experimental) -30 IB=67uA (Simulated) IB=124.5uA (Si.
