Adipose tissue though the mass was much decreased [20]. To see if adipose tissues without C/EBPa expression exist, the amount of C/EBPa expression in adipose tissues (kindly provided by the center for experimental animals of Tzu Chi University) from C57BL/6 mice was determined by qPCR. We did not find evidence of the existence of 842-07-9 site adipocytes lacking C/EBPa expression in vivo(Figure 7).DiscussionIn this work, we tested the hypothesis that increasing the length of induction time during adipogenesis could increase the degree of differentiation to the extent that qualitatively different conclusions would be reached. Our results supported this hypothesis. First we showed that non-confluent 3T3-L1 cells were induced into adipocytes by doubling the induction time or with the help of rosiglitazone. This effect was not limited to 3T3-L1 cells. Multipotential NIH/3T3 is one such cell line that showed increased adipogenicity after prolonged induction. Figure 1 showed that the NIH/3T3 fibroblasts can consistently form insulin responsive adipocytes without exogenous genes when induced with double concentration of FBS for extended period. When testing the adipogenic potential of cell lines or the roles of genes in adipogenesis, the length of induction period above which the cell lines will be judged as Dimethylenastron web non-adipogenic has not been clearly defined. Our results showed that slow rate of adipocytesconversion could be interpreted as inability to form adipocytes in some cases. Figure 2 showed that the NIH/3T3 cells had barely detectable C/EBPa mRNA and protein levels during adipogenesis. Figure 3 showed that C/EBPa knockdown blocked adipogenesis in 3T3-L1 cells but had no effect in NIH/3T3 cells. Furthermore, whether the knockdown was performed before or after induction of NIH/ 3T3 cell differentiation did not affect the insulin response of the induced adipocytes. The NIH/3T3 cells were an example of insulin responsive adipocytes formed without C/EBPa. C/EBPa is a member of the bZIP transcription factor family. Theoretically, the lack of C/EBPa during adipogenesis could be compensated by expression of the other members in this gene family, C/EBPb and C/EBPd. This possibility could not be easily tested by inactivating C/EBPb because of its essential role beyond activating C/EBPa. During 3T3-L1 cells differentiation C/EBPa rose and stayed at near peak level in the adipocytes but C/EBPb and C/EBPd peaked early then fell in both 3T3-L1 [21] and NIH/3T3 adipocytes. C/EBPb fell and rebound slightly and C/ EBPd decreased progressively with time. In addition, when Wu et al. over-expressed C/EBPb in NIH/3T3 cells to make them inducible like 3T3-L1 cells, continued transcription of C/EBPb throughout the differentiation process was required. The drop of C/EBPb level after D2 in Figure 4 did not favor C/EBPb substituting for C/EBPa in this study, though, this possibility could not be ruled out due to the different induction condition used in that study.A Cebpa Independent Model of Adipocytesadipocytes were compared in Figure 6.Only angiotensinogen (Agt) and PPARc showed significant difference between these cells. The effects of rosiglitazone on the NIH/3T3 adipocyte model were consistent with the clinical efficacy observed. Finally, the NIH/3T3 cells are much easier to work with than the 3T3-L1 cells. The adipogenic potential of NIH/3T3 cells is robust. The same batch has been used for more than 5 years without any noticeable change in differentiation provided they are.Adipose tissue though the mass was much decreased [20]. To see if adipose tissues without C/EBPa expression exist, the amount of C/EBPa expression in adipose tissues (kindly provided by the center for experimental animals of Tzu Chi University) from C57BL/6 mice was determined by qPCR. We did not find evidence of the existence of adipocytes lacking C/EBPa expression in vivo(Figure 7).DiscussionIn this work, we tested the hypothesis that increasing the length of induction time during adipogenesis could increase the degree of differentiation to the extent that qualitatively different conclusions would be reached. Our results supported this hypothesis. First we showed that non-confluent 3T3-L1 cells were induced into adipocytes by doubling the induction time or with the help of rosiglitazone. This effect was not limited to 3T3-L1 cells. Multipotential NIH/3T3 is one such cell line that showed increased adipogenicity after prolonged induction. Figure 1 showed that the NIH/3T3 fibroblasts can consistently form insulin responsive adipocytes without exogenous genes when induced with double concentration of FBS for extended period. When testing the adipogenic potential of cell lines or the roles of genes in adipogenesis, the length of induction period above which the cell lines will be judged as non-adipogenic has not been clearly defined. Our results showed that slow rate of adipocytesconversion could be interpreted as inability to form adipocytes in some cases. Figure 2 showed that the NIH/3T3 cells had barely detectable C/EBPa mRNA and protein levels during adipogenesis. Figure 3 showed that C/EBPa knockdown blocked adipogenesis in 3T3-L1 cells but had no effect in NIH/3T3 cells. Furthermore, whether the knockdown was performed before or after induction of NIH/ 3T3 cell differentiation did not affect the insulin response of the induced adipocytes. The NIH/3T3 cells were an example of insulin responsive adipocytes formed without C/EBPa. C/EBPa is a member of the bZIP transcription factor family. Theoretically, the lack of C/EBPa during adipogenesis could be compensated by expression of the other members in this gene family, C/EBPb and C/EBPd. This possibility could not be easily tested by inactivating C/EBPb because of its essential role beyond activating C/EBPa. During 3T3-L1 cells differentiation C/EBPa rose and stayed at near peak level in the adipocytes but C/EBPb and C/EBPd peaked early then fell in both 3T3-L1 [21] and NIH/3T3 adipocytes. C/EBPb fell and rebound slightly and C/ EBPd decreased progressively with time. In addition, when Wu et al. over-expressed C/EBPb in NIH/3T3 cells to make them inducible like 3T3-L1 cells, continued transcription of C/EBPb throughout the differentiation process was required. The drop of C/EBPb level after D2 in Figure 4 did not favor C/EBPb substituting for C/EBPa in this study, though, this possibility could not be ruled out due to the different induction condition used in that study.A Cebpa Independent Model of Adipocytesadipocytes were compared in Figure 6.Only angiotensinogen (Agt) and PPARc showed significant difference between these cells. The effects of rosiglitazone on the NIH/3T3 adipocyte model were consistent with the clinical efficacy observed. Finally, the NIH/3T3 cells are much easier to work with than the 3T3-L1 cells. The adipogenic potential of NIH/3T3 cells is robust. The same batch has been used for more than 5 years without any noticeable change in differentiation provided they are.
