Bulary analyses. We use differential language analysis (DLA), our particular method of open-vocabulary analysis, to find language features across millions of Facebook messages that distinguish demographic and psychological attributes. From a dataset of over 15.4 million Facebook messages collected from 75 thousand volunteers [12], we extract 700 million instances of words, phrases, and automatically generated topics and correlate them with gender, age, and personality. We replicate traditional language analyses by applying Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) [11], a popular tool in psychology, to our data set. Then, we show that open-vocabulary analyses can yield additional insights (correlations between PF-04418948 chemical information personality and behavior as manifest through language) and more information (as measured through predictive accuracy) than traditional a priori word-category approaches. We present a word cloud-based technique to visualize results of DLA. Our large set of correlations is made available for others to use (available at: http:www.wwbp.org/).BackgroundThis section outlines recent work linking language with personality, gender, and age. In line with the focus of this paper, we predominantly discuss works which sought to gain psychological insights. However, we also touch on increasingly popular attempts at predicting personality from language in social media, which, for our study, offer an empirical means to compare a closedPersonality, Gender, Age in Social Media Languagevocabulary analysis (relying on a priori word category human judgments) and an open vocabulary analysis (not relying on a priori word category judgments). Personality refers to the traits and characteristics that make an individual unique. Although there are multiple ways to classify traits [13], we draw on the popular Five Factor Model (or “Big 5”), which classifies personality traits into five dimensions: extraversion (e.g., outgoing, talkative, active), agreeableness (e.g., trusting, kind, generous), conscientiousness (e.g., self-controlled, responsible, thorough), neuroticism (e.g., anxious, depressive, touchy), and openness (e.g., intellectual, artistic, insightful) [14]. With work order Aprotinin beginning over 50 years ago [15] and journals dedicated to it, the FFM is a well-accepted construct of personality [16].Automatic Lexical Analysis of Personality, Gender, and AgeBy examining what words people use, researchers have long sought a better understanding of human psychology [17?9]. As Tauszczik Pennebaker put it: Language is the most common and reliable way for people to translate their internal thoughts and emotions into a form that others can understand. Words and language, then, are the very stuff of psychology and communication [20]. The typical approach to analyzing language involves counting word usage over pre-chosen categories of language. For example, one might place words like `nose’, `bones’, `hips’, `skin’, `hands’, and `gut’ into a body lexicon, and count how often words in the lexicon are used by extraverts or introverts in order to determine who talks about the body more. Of such word-category lexica, the most widely used is Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count or LIWC, developed over the last couple decades by human judges designating categories for common words [11,19]. The 2007 version of LIWC includes 64 different categories of language ranging from part-of-speech (i.e. articles, prepositions, past-tense verbs, numbers,…) to topical categories (i.e. fami.Bulary analyses. We use differential language analysis (DLA), our particular method of open-vocabulary analysis, to find language features across millions of Facebook messages that distinguish demographic and psychological attributes. From a dataset of over 15.4 million Facebook messages collected from 75 thousand volunteers [12], we extract 700 million instances of words, phrases, and automatically generated topics and correlate them with gender, age, and personality. We replicate traditional language analyses by applying Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) [11], a popular tool in psychology, to our data set. Then, we show that open-vocabulary analyses can yield additional insights (correlations between personality and behavior as manifest through language) and more information (as measured through predictive accuracy) than traditional a priori word-category approaches. We present a word cloud-based technique to visualize results of DLA. Our large set of correlations is made available for others to use (available at: http:www.wwbp.org/).BackgroundThis section outlines recent work linking language with personality, gender, and age. In line with the focus of this paper, we predominantly discuss works which sought to gain psychological insights. However, we also touch on increasingly popular attempts at predicting personality from language in social media, which, for our study, offer an empirical means to compare a closedPersonality, Gender, Age in Social Media Languagevocabulary analysis (relying on a priori word category human judgments) and an open vocabulary analysis (not relying on a priori word category judgments). Personality refers to the traits and characteristics that make an individual unique. Although there are multiple ways to classify traits [13], we draw on the popular Five Factor Model (or “Big 5”), which classifies personality traits into five dimensions: extraversion (e.g., outgoing, talkative, active), agreeableness (e.g., trusting, kind, generous), conscientiousness (e.g., self-controlled, responsible, thorough), neuroticism (e.g., anxious, depressive, touchy), and openness (e.g., intellectual, artistic, insightful) [14]. With work beginning over 50 years ago [15] and journals dedicated to it, the FFM is a well-accepted construct of personality [16].Automatic Lexical Analysis of Personality, Gender, and AgeBy examining what words people use, researchers have long sought a better understanding of human psychology [17?9]. As Tauszczik Pennebaker put it: Language is the most common and reliable way for people to translate their internal thoughts and emotions into a form that others can understand. Words and language, then, are the very stuff of psychology and communication [20]. The typical approach to analyzing language involves counting word usage over pre-chosen categories of language. For example, one might place words like `nose’, `bones’, `hips’, `skin’, `hands’, and `gut’ into a body lexicon, and count how often words in the lexicon are used by extraverts or introverts in order to determine who talks about the body more. Of such word-category lexica, the most widely used is Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count or LIWC, developed over the last couple decades by human judges designating categories for common words [11,19]. The 2007 version of LIWC includes 64 different categories of language ranging from part-of-speech (i.e. articles, prepositions, past-tense verbs, numbers,…) to topical categories (i.e. fami.
